View Full Version : 200mph C7
chrisheltra
12-18-2013, 11:09 PM
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/B-gzNi6MRwI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Pesce Nero
12-19-2013, 12:50 AM
looks like he sprayed it at 146mph
minytrker
12-19-2013, 01:25 AM
looks like he sprayed it at 146mph
100 shot is what i saw posted somewhere
blackws6mn6
12-19-2013, 04:26 AM
Yup go-go juice was used.
s14.5gonewide
12-21-2013, 06:15 AM
100 shot was used. small cam(street cam) stock ported heads,header, stock intake.. it took them 1 3/4 mile to get to the 200+mph.
DIGGLER
12-21-2013, 10:32 AM
i woulda left it stock and hit it with a 175 shot.
Carlrx7
12-21-2013, 12:08 PM
on the JUICE for 38 Seconds, dayum
RoadconeTuning
12-21-2013, 08:42 PM
jesus, thats a lonnngggg time on the gas... i wanna know what the bottle pressure was at the beginning and end of that.
s14.5gonewide
12-21-2013, 09:23 PM
jesus, thats a lonnngggg time on the gas... i wanna know what the bottle pressure was at the beginning and end of that.
i sent him a txt to see about bottle pressure and if it was a top end shot or from home.
s14.5gonewide
12-21-2013, 09:32 PM
hear is the answer i got.
42 seconds on the spray. Needed two bottles but only had one. Started at 1200 ended at 875 All in 5th
it make 600 at 1150psi(bottle pressure). By the end of the run I bet it was making close to 530 and was overfueling.. coming from the tuner of the car.
UnaBomber
12-21-2013, 09:55 PM
Took forever to get there
Carlrx7
12-22-2013, 01:27 AM
hear is the answer i got.
42 seconds on the spray. Needed two bottles but only had one. Started at 1200 ended at 875 All in 5th
it make 600 at 1150psi(bottle pressure). By the end of the run I bet it was making close to 530 and was overfueling.. coming from the tuner of the car.
Thanks for the update! Tell him to stop being a pussy and put the big boi jets in with a NANO assist kit.
DIGGLER
12-22-2013, 01:35 AM
106mm turbo.
BIRDMAN
12-22-2013, 01:51 AM
2v
s14.5gonewide
12-22-2013, 01:58 AM
106mm turbo.
they have a twin turbo setup as well not sure its 100% finished tho.
svtguy
12-22-2013, 08:23 AM
that car needs 2 mo gears and it could do 200 stock imo.
svtguy
12-22-2013, 08:27 AM
http://www.bmwm5powerv10.com/e60-m5-top-speed.html
mpower!!! bone stock 200mph club in a 4door!..
Carlrx7
12-22-2013, 11:39 AM
http://www.bmwm5powerv10.com/e60-m5-top-speed.html
mpower!!! bone stock 200mph club in a 4door!..
and 92,000 dollar MSRP! Its obvious the 7-Speed trans in the vette is not designed for a 200-mph run.
Lets see what the 8-speed auto will do with one of these...
http://images.thecarconnection.com/lrg/alleged-supercharged-6-2-liter-lt4-v8-for-c7-z06--photo-by-american-velocity-performance_100448962_l.jpg
aka the Z06
ForceFed4g63
12-22-2013, 10:54 PM
and 92,000 dollar MSRP! Its obvious the 7-Speed trans in the vette is not designed for a 200-mph run.
Lets see what the 8-speed auto will do with one of these...
http://images.thecarconnection.com/lrg/alleged-supercharged-6-2-liter-lt4-v8-for-c7-z06--photo-by-american-velocity-performance_100448962_l.jpg
aka the Z06
I wonder what the cost of all the upgrades to the C7 were...
svtguy
12-23-2013, 05:52 AM
Honestly if I was Chevrolet I wouldn't be happy with this video. It's 2013 and they need aftermarket and nitrous to hit 200.. Kinda makes corvette not look good IMO. Then again it is a huge achievement for vette owners to see the American suspension handle German speeds.
BIRDMAN
12-23-2013, 11:40 AM
Just a base model guys....lol
DolSVT00
12-23-2013, 02:12 PM
And to think a 60k mustang does that stock?
AverageJoe
12-23-2013, 02:15 PM
And to think a 60k mustang does that stock?
But its still a mustang.:poke:
DolSVT00
12-23-2013, 02:20 PM
But its still a mustang.:poke:
Ya its a mustang, a car that goes 200 mph, can carry 4 people, is cheaper and doesnt try to imitate a ferrari.
MonteC
12-23-2013, 02:24 PM
since when are any of you guys concerned about going 200mph?
BIRDMAN
12-23-2013, 02:56 PM
Ya its a mustang, a car that goes 200 mph, can carry 4 people, is cheaper and doesnt try to imitate a ferrari.
The new one tries to imitate an accord. Lol
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 06:13 PM
i was looking in a road and track today at work. had the 14 vette in it.
im trying to figure out the purpose of the 7 speed trans..... why would you want/need 3 overdrives? they listed top speed was acheived in 5th gear which was 190 at 6,000 rpms. in 6th it slowed to 183 at like 4,800 rpms. so, having said that, you wouldnt use 6th gear to achieve top speed, and you most likely arent going to use it when cruising. 5th gear is like .71, 6th is .58, and 7th is .49.
i figure they just wanted to say it had 7 gears. if they had left it a 6 speed maybe they could have shaved a little more rotational mass and overall weight of the car.
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 06:18 PM
Honestly if I was Chevrolet I wouldn't be happy with this video. It's 2013 and they need aftermarket and nitrous to hit 200.. Kinda makes corvette not look good IMO. Then again it is a huge achievement for vette owners to see the American suspension handle German speeds.
it didnt impress me much, either. i would have thought the car would have done that bone stock with a few seconds on the bottle, not heads/cam and 42 seconds of nitrous?
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 06:20 PM
And to think a 60k mustang does that stock?
i would still rather have the vette. lol
ForceFed4g63
12-23-2013, 06:38 PM
Shoot, between the base C7 and the GT 500, I'd take the stang all day.
GreebeanZ28
12-23-2013, 06:48 PM
Ya its a mustang, a car that goes 200 mph, can carry 4 people, is cheaper and doesnt try to imitate a ferrari.
Anybody actually validated Ford's claim to this 200 mph Mustang? I know Motor Trend tried and it couldnt do it....
GreebeanZ28
12-23-2013, 06:48 PM
Shoot, between the base C7 and the GT 500, I'd take the stang all day.
2 words: Full Retard.
GreebeanZ28
12-23-2013, 06:50 PM
"A rep tells us the Shelby needs about 17,000 feet of tarmac to hit top speed, and that the SVT team used one of the world's largest test tracks, the Nardo Ring in southern Italy, to confirm the 200-mph claim."
Well I'd say thats a bit more distance than the vette had. Just sayin'.
DolSVT00
12-23-2013, 06:56 PM
i would still rather have the vette. lol
I have a cheaper solution. www.penisenlargerandbluehairremoval.com
"A rep tells us the Shelby needs about 17,000 feet of tarmac to hit top speed, and that the SVT team used one of the world's largest test tracks, the Nardo Ring in southern Italy, to confirm the 200-mph claim."
Well I'd say thats a bit more distance than the vette had. Just sayin'.
At least it could get there stock
GreebeanZ28
12-23-2013, 07:05 PM
not in that same distance it cant.
CarsAndGames
12-23-2013, 07:11 PM
not in that same distance it cant.
can a bone stock vette that is the same price as a gt500 do it in 17,000 feet?
DolSVT00
12-23-2013, 07:13 PM
can a bone stock vette that is the same price as a gt500 do it in 17,000 feet?
Needs a JATO rocket.
ForceFed4g63
12-23-2013, 07:30 PM
2 words: Full Retard.
Sorry bo but it's true. Now when the ZO6/ZR1 comes out it will certainly be a different story.
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 07:36 PM
can a bone stock vette that is the same price as a gt500 do it in 17,000 feet?
lets talk skidpad numbers.
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 07:44 PM
I have a cheaper solution. www.penisenlargerandbluehairremoval.com
At least it could get there stock
n/a vs. supercharger.... i can understand why the stang MIGHT have a higher top speed. that is, if it actually does?
CarsAndGames
12-23-2013, 07:48 PM
lets talk skidpad numbers.
LEt's talk exactly about what the question was instead of bringing up something is completely different.
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 07:51 PM
LEt's talk exactly about what the question was instead of bringing up something is completely different.
lol thats what i thought. skidpad are just as valid as top speed numbers when comparing these 2 cars.
DolSVT00
12-23-2013, 08:00 PM
n/a vs. supercharger.... i can understand why the stang MIGHT have a higher top speed. that is, if it actually does?
Oh lawd, here we go. Somebody call the whambulance, its not the Mustangs fault they put that motor in that car and charge that much money for a name.
chrisheltra
12-23-2013, 08:20 PM
Why the fuck is the mustang even being brought up in this thread is beyond me. I just posted the vid because I thought it was cool as hell.
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 08:40 PM
Oh lawd, here we go. Somebody call the whambulance, its not the Mustangs fault they put that motor in that car and charge that much money for a name.
lol im not crying. the vette would still whip it on a road course, and probably runs about the same 1/4 mile times as the average gt500 driver.
DolSVT00
12-23-2013, 08:43 PM
Why the fuck is the mustang even being brought up in this thread is beyond me. I just posted the vid because I thought it was cool as hell.
Because its cheaper and faster than that erectile dysfunction mobile.
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 08:47 PM
Because its cheaper and faster than that erectile dysfunction mobile.
i figured erectile dysfunction was when you pay $60k for a $30k mustang with a blower and some nicer wheels so you could say you had a gt500. :finger:
CarsAndGames
12-23-2013, 08:56 PM
i figured erectile dysfunction was when you pay $60k for a $30k mustang with a blower and some nicer wheels so you could say you had a gt500. :finger:
Different interior, different motor, blower, wheels.. I can go on and on. But the fact you think it's just a blower and wheels, tells me I don't need to.
BIRDMAN
12-23-2013, 09:48 PM
*sigh*
It's top speed is only 195mph.
BIRDMAN
12-23-2013, 09:49 PM
"A rep tells us the Shelby needs about 17,000 feet of tarmac to hit top speed, and that the SVT team used one of the world's largest test tracks, the Nardo Ring in southern Italy, to confirm the 200-mph claim."
Well I'd say thats a bit more distance than the vette had. Just sayin'.
If someone tried that in the real world, then they'd probably run out of gas before getting to that top speed. lol
DIGGLER
12-23-2013, 10:11 PM
Different interior, different motor, blower, wheels.. I can go on and on. But the fact you think it's just a blower and wheels, tells me I don't need to.
lol
GreebeanZ28
12-24-2013, 10:43 AM
I like all this "the mustang is cheaper" talk....from Edmunds:
Today's 2014 Ford Shelby GT500 is essentially the same as last year. The 2014 edition carries a base price of $55,595, but our test car has the $3,495 SVT Performance package for the Torsen limited-slip diff, Bilstein two-mode dampers, uprated springs, stabilizer bars and forged wheels. Another $2,995 went for the SVT Track package and its engine, diff and transmission coolers.
Tack on $2,340 for navigation and dual-zone climate control, $1,595 for leather Recaro sport seats and $395 for Ruby Red metallic paint. It adds up to $66,415.
Our 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Z51 has the Performance Traction Management system and the electronically regulated "eLSD" limited-slip differential. At $54,795 it starts out cheaper than a GT500. The performance exhaust ($1,195) is good for racy sounds and the last 5 hp and 5 lb-ft of torque. Magnetic Selective Ride Control ($1,795) is GM's version of two-mode adaptive damping.
Chevy wants $8,005 for the Preferred Equipment package that adds navigation, an upgraded stereo, head-up display, heated and cooled seats and leather everywhere. Our car also sported $3,090 worth of carbon-fiber dress-up options.
Total damage: $69,375. But if we subtract the superfluous carbon baubles the price falls to $66,285, some $130 cheaper than the Shelby GT500.
BigdaddyDupree
12-24-2013, 11:23 AM
Most people who hate on vettes cant afford them. simple as that. They usually say its a midlife crisis. Haters
DIGGLER
12-24-2013, 12:18 PM
lmao at the gt500 costing more..... my thing is its still based off of a mustang gt, which can be had for $25k. a decked out gt500 package adds $40k worth of options? i know its a badass car, but that is steep. im glad ford loyalists are happy to pay that much for one.
UnaBomber
12-24-2013, 02:24 PM
Most people who hate on vettes cant afford them. simple as that. They usually say its a midlife crisis. Haters
People say that about all cars regardless of make and model
I hate on vettes because performance wise they aren't very impressive for the most part. Stock or modified
Now there are definitely some nasty vettes out there but most of them are meh, including the one in this thread
BIRDMAN
12-24-2013, 02:58 PM
I hate on vettes because performance wise they aren't very impressive for the most part. Stock or modified
http://www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/3723-cosby-wut.jpg
BigdaddyDupree
12-24-2013, 03:09 PM
People say that about all cars regardless of make and model
I hate on vettes because performance wise they aren't very impressive for the most part. Stock or modified
Now there are definitely some nasty vettes out there but most of them are meh, including the one in this thread
just think how nasty a corvette could be for the money you have in your car. you could have a vette running what your car does now for less then the initial purchase price of your gtr.
blkscls1z
12-24-2013, 03:45 PM
Vettes are Junk, Ugly, Slow, Overpriced, Unimpressive and just all around Gay!
ForceFed4g63
12-24-2013, 03:47 PM
Love me some gtr' s but saying vettes aren't impressive for the money is just plain silly.
DIGGLER
12-24-2013, 04:05 PM
that is the by far the dumbest thing that has been posted in this thread as of yet.
GreebeanZ28
12-24-2013, 05:15 PM
I concur.
MonteC
12-24-2013, 06:08 PM
that is the by far the dumbest thing that has been posted in this thread as of yet.
Search this site for *diggler* and *diesel* together. That guy said some pretty dumb shit!
GreebeanZ28
12-24-2013, 06:27 PM
Hes got more 'sperience with em than everyone else on here lol
DIGGLER
12-24-2013, 08:24 PM
Search this site for *diggler* and *diesel* together. That guy said some pretty dumb shit!
i figure i know more about a duramax than you ever will. can't be all that dumb.
RoadconeTuning
12-24-2013, 09:00 PM
I've owned ferd and chebys... i'd much rather have a c7 over a GT500... all around a nicer car, you dont have to worry about it going into limp mode after beating on it and it looks way nicer. if the GT500 was 40k like it should cost it'd be a great car... also why arent we comparing v6 to the c7? wouldnt that be a better base model comparison?
MonteC
12-24-2013, 09:15 PM
i figure i know more about a duramax than you ever will. can't be all that dumb.
You may want to recalculate your figuring.
DIGGLER
12-24-2013, 09:20 PM
You may want to recalculate your figuring.
no, im pretty sure.
GreebeanZ28
12-24-2013, 09:42 PM
Oh noes! I think Robs met his match!
///Mcompact
12-25-2013, 03:35 AM
I hate on vettes because performance wise they aren't very impressive for the most part. Stock or modified
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v499/kiley_sean/saywhat_zps983246e8.jpg
MonteC
12-25-2013, 09:50 AM
Oh noes! I think Robs met his match!
I'm all out of witty comebacks.
MonteC
12-25-2013, 10:00 AM
I'm all out of witty comebacks.
Actually I ran out along time ago. I've just been hoping no one notices.
GreebeanZ28
12-25-2013, 10:21 AM
Totally busted
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.