PDA

View Full Version : 2011 5.0 GT vs 2010 SS Camaro


Audie1
02-02-2011, 04:25 PM
Both are stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTL9psDWKjU&feature=related

CINDERBLOCK
02-02-2011, 04:57 PM
ouch old 5.0 put a hurtin on that SS

98nbmz
02-02-2011, 05:04 PM
Almost 9 sec 8th? OUCH.

Harry
02-02-2011, 05:30 PM
Hell my 94 autmatic Z28 ran 8.70 stock.

minytrker
02-02-2011, 05:36 PM
Thats not a LS3 camaro. Hell my 4 door G8 ran the same time as the camaro.

1iron
02-02-2011, 07:37 PM
That wasn't even a drag strip. I am sure both of those car would run faster.

1998ta__1991rs
02-02-2011, 07:41 PM
the '10 SS's are turtles

MonteC
02-02-2011, 07:44 PM
Great I cant even tell the difference between the v6's and v8's now i have to distinguish the autos from the manuals?!

ASkipper
02-02-2011, 08:21 PM
That Camaro was the L99 at 400 hp. It is a dog with the 3.27 gears and a 6200rpm redline. I agree that the mustang is faster. I think it would be closer if they were on a drag strip.

dkbmxer002
02-02-2011, 08:24 PM
my 4th gen went 8.5's stock.. i know those new camaro's are capable of alot faster than 8.7 or whatever it ran stock.. i still think stock for stock the mustang is faster but the camaro isn't that slow.

minytrker
02-02-2011, 11:19 PM
The few 2010 stock auto camaro's we ran at the track all ran really close to that. (8.7-8.9 1/8mile)They have the L99 motor not LS3 they only dyno 295-310rwhp stock and weigh 4k lbs. I'm not that big a fan of the camaro anyway but it did help me deside to get a G8 after tuning several and also running them at the track.

MonteC
02-02-2011, 11:27 PM
The few 2010 stock auto camaro's we ran at the track all ran really close to that. (8.7-8.9 1/8mile)They have the L99 motor not LS3 they only dyno 295-310rwhp stock and weigh 4k lbs. I'm not that big a fan of the camaro anyway but it did help me deside to get a G8 after tuning several and also running them at the track.

That is ridiculous. Stock 11 v6 mustangs are running 8.7-8.9. Id be more then pissed if i dropped that kind of coin on an SS and then was running door to door with a v6 mustang.

Audie1
02-02-2011, 11:30 PM
That is ridiculous. Stock 11 v6 mustangs are running 8.7-8.9. Id be more then pissed if i dropped that kind of coin on an SS and then was running door to door with a v6 mustang.

You got that right.

dkbmxer002
02-02-2011, 11:37 PM
The few 2010 stock auto camaro's we ran at the track all ran really close to that. (8.7-8.9 1/8mile)They have the L99 motor not LS3 they only dyno 295-310rwhp stock and weigh 4k lbs. I'm not that big a fan of the camaro anyway but it did help me deside to get a G8 after tuning several and also running them at the track.

wow that is bad.. i didn't realize there was that much of a difference from auto to manual in them.. it's like the mustangs and camaro's have switched lol.

bwelch
02-03-2011, 12:11 AM
the '10 SS's are turtles

Troof.

Shane361
02-03-2011, 12:33 AM
The GT grew up fast, 1000 higher redline, SRE, 4v, 412/390 NA which is awesome cause the Terminator was 390/390 WITH a supercharger.

minytrker
02-03-2011, 12:49 AM
That is ridiculous. Stock 11 v6 mustangs are running 8.7-8.9. Id be more then pissed if i dropped that kind of coin on an SS and then was running door to door with a v6 mustang.

I agree, I am not impressed with the new camaro at all. They do respond well to mods though, with just a tune you can drop .3-.5 which is where they should have ran stock, lol. They would also run better if they had a LS3 in them.

OUTLAW
02-03-2011, 07:47 AM
1 word ford