![]() |
flow results
LS 317 head with 2.00 intake and 1.55 exhaust
last night I did 2 ports, one the runner only with carbide cutter so it has dimpling similar to golf ball the second was runner, bowl and chamber and finished with sand paper roll Neil came over to help and verify results stock port .1 70 .2 144 .3 195 .4 230 .5 233 .6 236 runner only with carbide cutter .1 75 .2 146 .3 200 .4 242 .5 265 .6 276 whole port and chamber sand rolled .1 71 .2 143 .3 203 .4 242 .5 272 .6 280 the hump from the rocker bolt was not removed nor was the swirl hump near the guide on any port I use to remove the swirl hump and I'm not sure how much of a difference it makes but Dupree has a set I did for him a long time ago that I will test all and all, the 40 cfm increase should equate into a 60 hp increase on a mild build, 80 hp on higher comp, big cam engine one more thing, Neil brought over 2 efi intakes, IMO, the intakes could use a gasket match, or better yet, just make the whole port wider like I'm capable of doing with carb based intake setups matched to the felpro paper gasket |
my heads?
|
Quote:
|
no, lol
|
I dont know anything about flow numbers or porting but those numbers seem high to me. I got this from AI's webpage
"Typical gains for our CNC work are in the 20-30rwhp SAE range over the as cast 241" Those numbers seem more inline to me, but I know zero about porting. |
Nice work. how much you charging for the work?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
the simple formula is 1.5 hp per cfm for a hot street engine 2.0 hp for your run of the mill cookie cutter race engine 2.2 for balls out, high comp, low tension ring, gas ported piston type deal so a 40 cfm increase x 1.5 is a 60 hp gain. If you dont make that 60 hp gain then there is a reason like the cross section area of the intake is the restriction that brings me to some more heads that I flowed today I'll start with Texas Speed PRC 243 cnc heads with 2.0 valve .1 72 .2 137 .3 199 .4 241 .5 284 .6 307 these heads have the rocker bolt hump and swirl hump removed, also the cross section of the port was wider than stock. if you bolted a stock intake and gasket to this head, it surely would limit its potential because the intake and stock gasket is smaller than the port also brought over today was an AFR 225 cathedral port head with 2.08 valve .1 75 .2 141 .3 203 .4 250 .5 290 .6 319 Also flowed today and I'm completely embarrassed about this because I ported these a few years ago, were 5.3 heads with 1.88 intake valve .1 70 .2 134 .3 190 .4 216 .5 245 .6 253 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do an increase in cfm always equal more hp? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
no, the cfm does not always make more HP. velocity is critically important, the reason for such long runners on newer V8s. swirl into the chamber is also very important, one of the reason why i'm now gun shy about taking the swirl hump out.
the Texas Speed port is really big. If I can get Neil over here this week, I would like to do some intake bolted to the head testing. my feeling is my port job with a smaller runner will be equall in CFM to the Texas Speed head but mine will have more velocity which I can't measure yet because all the little add ons cost money and I have none the smallest port with good flow equalls the fastest time down the track |
Quote:
583/2.0(hp per cfm)=291cfm |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
FAST 92 unported. Nick Williams 92mm tb. FTP 98mm air lid.
|
Quote:
|
Gaskets are in,so whenever you want the heads...let me know
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.