Quote:
Originally Posted by DolSVT00
Basiclly, Yes I garuntee its more stingy.
Dynojet
The Dynojet chassis dyno is referred to as an inertia-type dynamometer, because large drums provide an inertial load to the drivetrain instead of a friction brake.
Mustang
The Mustang chassis dyno uses an Inertia load as well as an eddycurrent brake load to simulate the "actual" load (combined aerodynamic plus rolling frictional load) that the vehicle would experience when in motion. The internals of the Mustang dyno are composed of an eddy current brake to provide a variable load and an inertial disc to provide a fixed load.
Bottom line, the more power you make, its gonna hurt you all the more. And an AWD mustang is even worse.
Their both just Printer B.S Generators.
|
honestly, if the mustang Dyno told me i had less then 500 hp at the wheels i wouldnt even consider it accurate at all. i know my engine makes around 700, that is basically the limits of a stock block. at the dyno day at ls1, my car made 540 and Lorenz didnt even want to do another pull because it was on the very lean side so his sounds pretty accurate to me but i dont know either