View Single Post
Old 01-23-2009, 10:23 AM   #41
minytrker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DolSVT00 View Post
Basiclly, Yes I garuntee its more stingy.

Dynojet
The Dynojet chassis dyno is referred to as an inertia-type dynamometer, because large drums provide an inertial load to the drivetrain instead of a friction brake.


Mustang
The Mustang chassis dyno uses an Inertia load as well as an eddycurrent brake load to simulate the "actual" load (combined aerodynamic plus rolling frictional load) that the vehicle would experience when in motion. The internals of the Mustang dyno are composed of an eddy current brake to provide a variable load and an inertial disc to provide a fixed load.

Bottom line, the more power you make, its gonna hurt you all the more. And an AWD mustang is even worse.

Their both just Printer B.S Generators.

Dynojets can also be load bearing, I can add a eddycurrent brake on mine but its another $15k on top of the $30k I paid for the dyno.
minytrker is offline   Reply With Quote