Carolina Horsepower  

Go Back   Carolina Horsepower > Technical > Technical > Forced Induction Tech
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2010, 09:44 PM   #1
DolSVT00
Moderator
 
DolSVT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goose Creek
Posts: 3,913
Send a message via ICQ to DolSVT00 Send a message via Yahoo to DolSVT00
Default Ring gap discussion.

Not that I plan on really changing anything, but I read this both ways.

Now I know the formula's for compression/bore for ring gaps and I know you would want to loosen it up on the top ring especially for boosted and nitrous applications

I typicly set my gaps at .023 top ring for a 3.572 bore and .015 for the bottom ring. (plasma moly construction)

But I have heard and read that there are advantages to setting the bottom ring gap larger (as in larger than the top ring gap) and making more power in boosted applications (the Import scene does this often). On to the theory... Supposedly the pressures are built up between the top ring and the bottom ring and create more heat on the piston and by filing the bottom ring larger, you allow for a bit more blow-by and thus make more power from less heat.

I'd like to hear some opinions on ither method.
__________________
DolSVT00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 09:55 PM   #2
slowgreen99
Senior Member
 
slowgreen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Summerville
Posts: 7,740
Default

spray it
__________________

M.R.E.
Bad Bob Motorsports
slowgreen99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:01 PM   #3
BAD BOB
Senior Member
 
BAD BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SUMMERVILLE
Posts: 3,681
Default

i would feel that blow by is a boosted engines enemy but i dont know anything about boost
__________________
IM BAD BOB
BAD BOB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:03 PM   #4
Derek
Senior Member
 
Derek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: West of the mutha f**cking Ashley
Posts: 1,784
Send a message via Yahoo to Derek
Default

I was told that a good engine builder hones cylinders to fit a certain power adder. but know nothing of rings. will admit moderate knowledge.
Derek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:16 PM   #5
DolSVT00
Moderator
 
DolSVT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goose Creek
Posts: 3,913
Send a message via ICQ to DolSVT00 Send a message via Yahoo to DolSVT00
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAD BOB View Post
i would feel that blow by is a boosted engines enemy but i dont know anything about boost
Thats the way I alwayse thaught about it, but the more I read... The more I wonder.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek View Post
I was told that a good engine builder hones cylinders to fit a certain power adder. but know nothing of rings. will admit moderate knowledge.
Not necesserily for certain power adders, but mostly for ring type and in ring type selection you select for the power adder.

And it has more to do with the rings construction than anything and the cyl wall finish should fit that ring type. (Medium, Fine,Coarse) Example for cast iron chrome rings you would want about a medium finish (around 280 grit) for Moly rings, you would want a fine finish (around 400 grit)
__________________
DolSVT00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:24 PM   #6
Derek
Senior Member
 
Derek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: West of the mutha f**cking Ashley
Posts: 1,784
Send a message via Yahoo to Derek
Default

Ahhhhh!
Derek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:26 PM   #7
Pesce Nero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,680
Default

your top ring gap seems big for your size piston. my engine is built for spray and i'm only at a 24 gap for mine. i cant see taking your second ring larger than 15.

filling the engine with blowby without a vaccuum pump on the motor also seems like a bad deal but i really dont know either
__________________
Pesce Nero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:30 PM   #8
WWhittle
Senior Member
 
WWhittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Posts: 3,899
Default

Increase blow by??? New to me.
WWhittle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:36 PM   #9
slowgreen99
Senior Member
 
slowgreen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Summerville
Posts: 7,740
Default

spray it
__________________

M.R.E.
Bad Bob Motorsports
slowgreen99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:36 PM   #10
DolSVT00
Moderator
 
DolSVT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goose Creek
Posts: 3,913
Send a message via ICQ to DolSVT00 Send a message via Yahoo to DolSVT00
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIXPACKGUT View Post
your top ring gap seems big for your size piston. my engine is built for spray and i'm only at a 24 gap for mine. i cant see taking your second ring larger than 15.

filling the engine with blowby without a vaccuum pump on the motor also seems like a bad deal but i really dont know either
.023-.025 Is commonly what I do with our rings and is typicly a general consensus from every builder I have talked to in the past about mod motors (and what chrisheltra's and my first build was). I know on N/A motors you would tighten them up for our bore size.

Now the bottom ring I agree I usually woln't go larger than .013, I pretty much agree with you.

But I keep reading these articles about a larger bottom gap and it goes against everything I know about building engines.... I figured it would be a pretty good discussion topic.
__________________
DolSVT00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:39 PM   #11
DolSVT00
Moderator
 
DolSVT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goose Creek
Posts: 3,913
Send a message via ICQ to DolSVT00 Send a message via Yahoo to DolSVT00
Default

(from a discussion Board)

Most piston ring manufacturers recommend a minimum end gap of .004 inches times the bore diameter for the top piston compression ring. So for a 4 inch bore, the standard end gap would be .016 inches.

For the 2nd compression ring, the standard end gap recommendation for most stock engines is typically .005 in. x the bore diameter. So for a 4 inch bore, the minimum end gap on the 2nd ring would be .020 inches.

For a modified street performance engine that generates more horsepower and heat, the end gap should be opened up a bit to compensate for increased thermal expansion. The recommendation would be a minimum top compression piston ring end gap of.0045 to .005 inches times the bore diameter. For a 4 inch bore, the ring end gap on the top ring should be increased to .018 to .020 inches.

For the 2nd compression ring on a modified street performance engine, the recommendation is typically open up the end gap to .0055 inches times the bore diameter. For a 4 inch bore, the 2nd ring would be gapped to .022 inches.

For a nitrous or blown racing engine, the top ring end gap sould be opened up to as much as .006 or .007 inches times the bore diameter. Now we're looking at a 2nd ring end gap of .024 to .028 inches in an engine with 4 inch bores.

For the 2nd ring on a nitrous or blown motor, the recommended ring end gap is even wider: .0063 to .0073 inchestimes the bore ( or 0.025 to 0.029 inches with a 4 inch bore).

The recommended ring end gap for oil rings regardless of the engine application is typically .015 inches.

The real Kicker

Some racers believe that opening up the 2nd end gap even more (say an additional 10%) can improve overall ring sealing by allowing trapped gases to escape before they blow past the top ring and cause ring flutter at high rpm (say above 5000 to 6000 rpm).
__________________
DolSVT00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:52 PM   #12
WWhittle
Senior Member
 
WWhittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Posts: 3,899
Default

I can't relate to that because they consider 5-6000 rpm to be "high rpm". LOL.
WWhittle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:58 PM   #13
DolSVT00
Moderator
 
DolSVT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goose Creek
Posts: 3,913
Send a message via ICQ to DolSVT00 Send a message via Yahoo to DolSVT00
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Whittle View Post
I can't relate to that because they consider 5-6000 rpm to be "high rpm". LOL.
Well, it is for turtles and big blocks......... like us
__________________
DolSVT00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:00 PM   #14
WWhittle
Senior Member
 
WWhittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Posts: 3,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DolSVT00 View Post
Well, it is for turtles and big blocks......... like us
That would be REALLY high for my diesel!
WWhittle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:02 PM   #15
DolSVT00
Moderator
 
DolSVT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goose Creek
Posts: 3,913
Send a message via ICQ to DolSVT00 Send a message via Yahoo to DolSVT00
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Whittle View Post
That would be REALLY high for my diesel!
__________________
DolSVT00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:03 PM   #16
Pesce Nero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,680
Default

i was mistakin, im 34 top 36 second
__________________
Pesce Nero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:13 PM   #17
1998ta__1991rs
Senior Member
 
1998ta__1991rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Ash
Posts: 4,283
Default

spray it
__________________


Funny
1998ta__1991rs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:24 PM   #18
WWhittle
Senior Member
 
WWhittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Posts: 3,899
Default

spray it.
WWhittle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:53 PM   #19
Matts94Z28
Senior Member
 
Matts94Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Summerville
Posts: 12,039
Default

spray it.
__________________


Charleston Performance Solutions
4560 Rivers Ave.
N. Charleston SC 29405
843-225-1142


https://www.facebook.com/CharlestonPerformanceSolutions


www.facebook.com/Selepack
Matts94Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 03:24 AM   #20
bwelch
Senior Member
 
bwelch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,774
Default

^^^What they said!
bwelch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.