WTB - Complete LS3 Intake, LS1 Intake, LS3 Rockers

[GreebeanZ28]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

68cc is a big ass chamber?

Well by the time I mill them down to just get back to stock compression~.030, theres hardly enough ptv clearence with that big ass valve to run a 22x/23x cam. And even then its gonna be a turd because of the barely stock compression vs stock, milled 243 head. If I had piles of money around i'd see how the square ports work on a stock bottom end ls2 since ive got a set here, but I really dont wanna do a head swap twice if im not sure theyre gonna work as well as something else.

[ElecTech]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

what is Adam's MPH and Weight?

at least 104 at 3300lbs right? if he is lighter than that, which I think is possible, then the MPH would have to be higher

Not sure on the MPH, but I know his quickest motor pass was a 6.38 and I think his race weight is 3100 lbs.

He may be able to chime in on the mph.

EDIT: MPH was 105

[adamcs]

Weight was also 3200 still

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by adamcs

Weight was also 3200 still

I knew it ran good, sounds like 600

[RoadconeTuning]

Originally Posted by Matts94Z28

inb4roadcone

I've talked to a number of different cam and head guys across the country about what i wanted to do and the general consensus was if you're staying with a baby cam meaning under a 224 then the LS3/L92 will make more power... beyond that Cathedral ports make more power everywhere. I would say it'd be cool to see LS3 heads on a large bore motor like an LS7 but why bother when you have an LS7 head that will make more power everywhere again...

[Harry]

Originally Posted by ElecTech

Not sure on the MPH, but I know his quickest motor pass was a 6.38 and I think his race weight is 3100 lbs.

He may be able to chime in on the mph.

EDIT: MPH was 105

That MPH seems low. Let out and ran 6.38?

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by RoadconeTuning

I've talked to a number of different cam and head guys across the country about what i wanted to do and the general consensus was if you're staying with a baby cam meaning under a 224 then the LS3/L92 will make more power... beyond that Cathedral ports make more power everywhere. I would say it'd be cool to see LS3 heads on a large bore motor like an LS7 but why bother when you have an LS7 head that will make more power everywhere again...

what is the biggest bore you can go on the 5.7 blocks?

[jmd]

Originally Posted by GreebeanZ28

Well by the time I mill them down to just get back to stock compression~.030, theres hardly enough ptv clearence with that big ass valve to run a 22x/23x cam. And even then its gonna be a turd because of the barely stock compression vs stock, milled 243 head. If I had piles of money around i'd see how the square ports work on a stock bottom end ls2 since ive got a set here, but I really dont wanna do a head swap twice if im not sure theyre gonna work as well as something else.

how about a 230/238 624 /112 cam. heads milled .030 with a 40 cosmetic head gasket. can that make power?

[ElecTech]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

what is the biggest bore you can go on the 5.7 blocks?

On a stock sleeve, most won't go beyond 3.905.

[GreebeanZ28]

Originally Posted by jmd

how about a 230/238 624 /112 cam. heads milled .030 with a 40 cosmetic head gasket. can that make power?

Im sure it can. Still might not run worth a damn though lol.

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by ElecTech

On a stock sleeve, most won't go beyond 3.905.

what bore size do the square ports come on? I thought the l92 are on truck motors

[BigdaddyDupree]

L92 come on 6.2.

[adamcs]

Originally Posted by Harry

That MPH seems low. Let out and ran 6.38?

I think the stars just aligned on that pass, it normally goes mid .4x at the same mph, it's a nitrous converter and all too.

[ElecTech]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

what bore size do the square ports come on? I thought the l92 are on truck motors

Its a 4.065